What Jurors Probably Don't Know About Defense Medical Experts

Alison De Villiers
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 682
Visit Alison De Villiers on LinkedInVisit Alison De Villiers on Avvo
Posted by Alison De VilliersJune 22, 2009 12:35 PM

When a Plaintiff is injured due to the negligence of another, the Plaintiff must rely on her doctors to testify as to the nature and extent of her injuries. In most states, like Ohio, the attorney for the Defendant/insurance company is then allowed to hire a doctor to examine the Plaintiff and render an opinion on the nature and extent of the Plaintiff's injuries. In the Cincinnati area, my clients are repeatedly sent to the same few doctors to be examined. It is extremely rare that one of these doctors will agree with the Plaintiff's treating physicians regarding the extent of the Plaintiff's injuries.

To the typical juror, the defense medical experts may seem to be on equal footing as the Plaintiff's treating physicians. The attorney for the Plaintiff can do her best to show how much the defense medical expert is being paid for his time and how much that equals out to per year. But, it seems to have little effect on jurors. The defense attorneys often argue: Why would this doctor risk his medical reputation by sticking his neck out for me or my firm in this case?

What the jurors do not know is that if the defense medical doctors start agreeing with the Plaintiff's doctors, the attorney for Allstate or State Farm will not be as inclined hire them to do defense medical exams. Lose one insurance company and that could equal hundreds of thousands of dollars per year in lost income.

Although this article written for doctors about serving as an expert witness in cases was written in 2003, the information remains relevant. It emphasizes the high ethical obligations of medical expert witnesses, both for the Plaintiffs and the Defendants. It points out that one of the main problems in the legal system in regards to expert testimony is the lack of accountability for statements made by expert witnesses under oath. The article suggests peer review of expert witness testimony to ensure that it is medically sound. Another suggestion is to have court appointed defense medical examiners.

2 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Martin Turner
Posted by Martin Turner
June 22, 2009 8:41 PM

You should do another article about doctors who previously made tons of money testifying for tobacco companies when they claimed that tobacco wasn't harmful. Some of those same doctors have been working for the insurance industry over the past 10 years to help hide the truth about the health effects of toxic mold. Dr. Raymond Harbison is one example.

Gabrielle D'AlemberteInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Gabrielle D'Alemberte
June 22, 2009 9:35 PM

I agree with Martin- those stories are fascinating.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Cincinnati

InjuryBoard Cincinnati RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Cincinnati is brought to you by Goodson & Company

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Goodson & Company (866) 735-1102 Ext 680 www.goodsonandcompany.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Cincinnati, Amelia, Batavia, Fairfield, Georgetown, Goshen, Hamilton, Hillsboro, Loveland, Lynchburg, Manchester, Mason, New Richmond, Norwood
110 East Eighth StreetSuite 200, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address